Poster Judging Form | Life Science Washington

Name *

First

Last

Name Opportunity The

Please select the number of the poster you are judging:

The Problem & Solution/Program/Description are…

1 – Missing or poorly stated
2 – Not clearly stated and/or the solution did not directly relate to the background information on the problem.
3 – Stated but the solution does not seem novel
4 – Clearly stated and related to the provided background information. The solution is different from existing products/services.
5 – Clearly stated. Connections to previous literature and broader issues are identified. The solution as described includes a competitive advantage over existing solutions, if any.

Data & Future | Experiments/Steps

1 – Data is not presented, making it hard to believe the claims.
2 – Data is confusing, not presented logically. Legends/keys for figures are absent.
3 – Data presented is fairly good, but future experiments or validations are needed.
4 – Data supporting the claim is present.
5 – Data is easily understood, well presented and strongly backs the solution claims. Future steps are well thought-out.

The Team

1 – Major skillsets necessary to solve the problem are missing.
2 – Expertise to address the problems they are trying to solve is absent.
3 – Skill sets are adequate to solve the problem.
4 – Expertise of the team needed to solve the problem is good.
5 – Above average expertise and an advisory team to solve the problem are present.

Traction & Market Opportunity

1 – No information on the market for this product.
2 – Minimal potential market opportunity is identified.
3 – A fair idea of the market opportunity is apparent.
4 – Great idea of the available market, as well as a product fit for the market.
5 – Market projections are thoroughly outlined as well as the possibility for other markets.

Overall Presentation

1 – Content is poorly laid out, and the text is difficult to read.
2 – Content provided is limited and does not improve understanding of the project.
3 – Content provided is appropriate, but it is not organized well.
4 – Content is presented clearly.
5 – Content is easy to follow in the absence of the presenter. Excellent visuals and graphics.